Last week I spend a decent chunk of time doing meta-reviews for CHI 2007 short papers. It was striking to me out of the nine papers I meta-reviewed, the number for which the reviewers’ collective feedback was “interesting, well-written, but you have no analysis to support your claims.” Ah, yes! I am reminded of the difference between a blog post and a research paper (ahem).
- our blog:
- The Waggleverse
Search All of Waggle Labs
Pages
-
Liquid error: undefined method `empty?' for nil:NilClass
Latest Blog Posts
- Run Rails migrations right from the console
- Swaggle.mobi on Mashable
- How to have a better functioning brain
- My O'Reilly Facebook Research Report Published!
- Pathable Beta Testing
- DVNO
- Venture Capital Wear
- Three way chess
- Prototyping Project History
- There is a reason Google's the best
- We are so Meta: Generic Thread on a Mailing List
- Oddflower: automatic meme detection
- Facebook Events
- European hair map
- Software you can touch
© 2006-2008 WaggleLabs, LLC
